Present Realities That Prove a Present Millennium, I

Present Realities and Thousand Years

The fact of the matter is: there must a reconciliation between one’s understanding of the thousand years and present realities. What do I mean by that? There are two concepts in the Bible that relate to eschatology.

The first is that there are experiences that the Bible mentions take place during the millennium. Secondly, the Bible presents in one chapter in all of Scripture that the millennium is a thousand years.

Thirdly, those experiences that happen during the millennium also happen during the first century. The Bible uses present tense language to talk about the experiences of the millennium.

What is the Solution for this Dilemma?

The solution for the present experiences during the thousand years is simple. If the millennial experiences are also present experiences then the millennium is also a present experience.

This doesn’t automatically mean that the millennium is spiritual. However, it does heavily demand the present nature of the millennium. It also highly suggests that the chiliast’s understanding of the millennium is flawed. The chiliast believes the millennial experiences are earthly, centered in Palestine, and focused on an earthly reign of Jesus.

Therefore, if the experiences are in fact present then the above understandings are flawed.

So What are Examples of these Present Experiences?

I’ve mentioned several present experiences in Revelation 20 already here. The context of Revelation 20 shows experiences like being a kingdom of priests, safe from the second death, and reigning with Christ as present realities. Concepts that Revelation 20 says happen in the Millennium.

There is another, very important concept that relates to the Millennium that the Bible explicitly says is a present reality. Revelation 12:7 states that Michael rises up, war breaks out in heaven, and Satan and his demons are thrown out.

This is important, as Luke 10:17-20 teaches that this very thing happened during the ministry of the seventy-two. Notice specific key elements of the two accounts:

1). Revelation says that Satan is thrown out of Heaven and to the earth. Luke says that Satan fell from Heaven like lightning.

2). Revelation 12:10 indicates that the authority of Jesus came. Luke 10:19 teaches that Jesus gave authority to the seventy-two and Luke 10:17 proves the seventy-two used that authority successfully.

3). The seventy-two are sent out because of the kingdom of God is near (Luke 10:9, 11), Revelation 12 teaches that it has come.

If we expand our survey of the present realities to John 12:31 we see the same language.

4). John 12:31 indicates that the ruler of the world is cast out. And the casting of the ruler of the world happens in the lifting up of the Son of Man. Revelation 12 teaches that the blood of the lamb is the power by which God’s people defeat Satan.

The similarities are too striking to ignore. I’m well aware that there are differences in terminology in Revelation and in the Gospels. This doesn’t prove that the accounts refer to different concepts. In fact, the different terminologies strengthen what I’m saying.

The Benefit of Different Terms

The fact that accounts of present realities would use different terms is a strength to my position. It is also a strength to the differences as we have two different authors.

These authors share the same doctrine relating to the fall of Satan and yet are capable of using different terms to express the same event. And can provide additional information and different perspectives on what happened.

We would expect that John would have more information in both his Gospel and the Revelation. Simply because he was granted a far more full picture than Luke was. And this is exactly what we see in the above accounts.

Present Realities Prove a Present Millennium

The Millennium starts with the defeat and binding of Satan. Actually, that’s a huge point for Revelation 20. Therefore, when we see Satan taken down in highly similar terminology in the Gospels saying that it actually happened during the first century and that this event triggers the Millennium then we are forced to conclude that the Millennium has already started.

As this is the case, the only logical conclusions regarding the nature of the Millennium is that either it is over or that it is still going in a realized, spiritual sense. As the end of the Millennium results in the resurrection of the dead and the creation of the New Heavens and the New Earth, it’s safe to conclude that the Millennium is not over yet.

Therefore, Amillennialism holds the only consistent, Biblical representation of what the Bible teaches.

(Visited 646 times, 1 visits today)


  1. Like the Evolutionists: If a scheme (theory ) fits the pattern of Amillennialism, then it must be true, Your article is flawed.
    1) verses that teachers of Amillennialism use to recontexturalise the bible do not symbolise or allegorise 1000 years(Millennium). (2 Pet.3:8, Psalm 90:4) this is unrighteous.
    2) The Kingdom of God is both NOW and FUTURE. NOW in the PRESENT IN the Believer. FUTURE when King Jesus comes and set up His Kingdom in the FUTURE here ON the Earth, for a literal 1000 years. The Bible says so once, therefore God has said so, do you call Him a liar? This is THE Present Reality. Now I have shown YOUR article to be FLAWED

    1. Attempting to conflate Amillennialism with evolution is purely disingenuous. Nothing that I’ve presented is remotely close to just fitting schemes, I exegeted Revelation 20 and demonstrated how the facts presented in this passage require us to believe that the thousand years is a present reality. In order to demonstrate that my article is flawed, you have to prove the contrary. Namely, you need to demonstrate how we have not experienced the first resurrection already, how we are currently at risk of hell, how we are not a kingdom of priests currently, and how we are not presently reigning with Christ. Once you demonstrate how those concepts are not currently true and how we are waiting for those facts to be a reality then you demonstrate how my article is flawed.

      There are also serious issues in what you stated. Here are a few of my responses:

      1). You’ve ignored the fact that 2 Peter 3:8 likens a thousand years to a day and vice versa. That’s the point. How are a literal thousand years like a literal 24 hour period of time? Psalm 90:4 is poetic and symbolizes a thousand years with yesterday. The only thing that’s unrighteous is not allowing the Bible to speak for itself.

      2). The fact that the Kingdom of God is “NOW” proves Amillennialism is correct since the Kingdom is synonymous with the thousand-year reign. The Bible *explicitly* states that Christ’s kingdom “is not of this earth”. So no, I don’t call Him a liar at all, I let God speak for himself. The concept of an already and not yet, a now and a yet future *is* Amillennial teaching. The issue is that the Bible does not teach a literal thousand-year reign of Christ on the earth prior to the destruction/recreation of the existing earth.

      Unfortunately, you haven’t demonstrated anything, let alone how my article is flawed. All you’ve done is made baseless assertions and wild-eyed accusations.

      1. Just adding a note saying what you said!

        Understanding the True Meaning of the Millennium, the 1,000 Years!

        The Greek word translated thousand in Revelation 20, is chilioi, an indefinite plural of chilias, one thousand. Chilioi can mean one thousand, but it also can mean any number of years over a thousand and by being plural, it is figurative, as is most all of Revelation.

        “…the Son of God, who once died on the cross, and now reigns upon the throne of glory…” Matthew Henry, 1662-1714; Concise Commentary on the Whole Bible, page 1182.

    2. Here’s a different perspective and use of scripture to share why I believe we are in the end times of the Millennial Kingdom.

      The Kingdom of God – Is here, we are here physically but we are not a part of this world. We are kings and priest today, but where? In the spiritual where Jesus reigns over all that is!

      To better understand, we need to show that the kingdom of God has already been in place since Jesus rose from the dead in victory. During the forty days after the resurrection, Jesus fulfills this promise of its presence.

      Jesus said: “Unto what is the kingdom of God (heaven) like? And where unto shall I resemble it? It is like a grain of mustard seed, which a man took, and cast into the garden…” Luke 13:18, 19

      Jesus said: “The kingdom of heaven (God) is like to a grain of mustard seed, which a man took, and sowed in his field: which indeed is the least (smallest) of all seeds…” Matthew 13:31, 32.

      Now, if a man took one of the smallest of all seeds, a mustard seed, and cast it into a garden, into a field, do you think he would be able to find it? Is Jesus saying that the Kingdom of God is “hidden”? Hidden, as in “Spiritual”? Let’s verify this.

      Jesus said: “Where unto shall I liken the kingdom of God? It is like leaven, which a woman took and hid in three measures of meal…” Luke 13:20, 21

      Jesus said: “The kingdom of heaven is like unto leaven, which a woman took, and hid in three measures of meal…” Matthew 13:33.

      The kingdom of God is hidden! “For you died, and your life is now hidden with Christ in God”. Colossians 3:3

      It is in an unseen Spiritual realm! “While we look not at the things which are seen, but at the things which are not seen: for the things which are seen are temporal; but the things which are not seen are eternal.” II Corinthians 4:18

      “Once, having been asked by the Pharisees when the kingdom of God would come, Jesus replied, “The kingdom of God does not come with your careful observation, nor will people say ‘Here it is’ or There it is’ because the kingdom of God is within you.” Luke 17:20, 21. To be within us, is spiritual; the kingdom of God is a spiritual kingdom.

      In Revelation 1:5 we are told Jesus is the prince of the kings of the earth. Who are the kings? Verse 6 says: Jesus “…has made us kings…” In verse 9, John says he is our brother and companion in the tribulation but he also says “in the kingdom…of Jesus Christ…” This is all present tense, it is saying that the kingdom was in the here and now of John’s time and therefore has been ever since.

      Here’s a different perspective wherein Jesus is letting it be known to those close to him that the kingdom of God has come.

      Jesus said: “I will not drink henceforth…until that day when I drink it new with you in my Father’s kingdom.” Matthew 26:29

      Jesus said: “Verily I say unto you, I will drink no more…until that day that I drink it new in the kingdom of God.” Mark 14:25. Think of what he said: “I drink it new”.

      What was new? After the crucifixion, Jesus rose in victory with a glorified body, He had just been transformed into King Jesus our Lord and Savior, He was new! Then for 40 days Jesus remained on earth. Did he eat and drink after he was resurrected?

      From John 21:12 Jesus said: “Come and dine.” Verse 15 says: “they had dined” Jesus ate and drank again, ‘with them’, after the resurrection, anew in the kingdom of God.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.